Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
M.G.S. KAMAL, J
MRS. SWETHA THIMMIAH – Appellant
Versus
NIL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks letters of administration. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. insistence on sureties questioned. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. court considers execution requirements. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. definition and purpose of administrator established. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. provisions of law concerning sureties clarified. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 6. discretionary power of the court to require sureties. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. circumstances exempting surety requirements detailed. (Para 22) |
| 8. deceased's will and codicil analyzing bequests. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 9. details of assets pertinent to administration bond. (Para 26 , 27) |
| 10. court concludes necessity of bond. (Para 28 , 29) |
| 11. petitioner required to furnish bond for specific debts. (Para 30 , 31) |
| 12. court refrains from ruling on definitions of surety and security. (Para 32 , 33) |
ORAL ORDER ON I.A.1/2025 & I.A.No.2/2025
An application in I.A.No.1/2025 is filed under Section 151 Code of Civil Procedure seeking dispensation of execution of Administration Bond by the petitioner for the purpose of issuance of Letters of Administration as required under Section 291 of the Indian Succession Act 1925 , (hereinafter referred to as the Act 1925).
2. An
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
