Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
H.P. SANDESH, J
N.S. RANGAPPA – Appellant
Versus
G. MAHANTHAMMA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of criminal revision petitions filed. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding the errors in the trial court's decisions. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 9) |
| 3. discussions on case law relevant to the burden of proof. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. analysis of evidential inconsistencies presented by the accused. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 19) |
| 5. judicial findings on the validity of the transaction. (Para 18 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. court assessment of evidence and dismissal of revision petitions. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 7. final order and conclusion of the judgment. (Para 28) |
CAV ORDER
2. The factual matrix of each case of the complainant Smt.G.Mahantamma who is the common complainant in all the cases and accused N.S.Rangappa who is the revision petitioner in Crl.R.P.No.1301/2015 and Crl.R.P.No.1300/2015 in other two criminal revision petitions, Smt.Kavitha.G.H who is the wife of N.S.Rangappa who is the revision petitioner in other two cased and claim of complainant that accused that is N.S.Rangappa had borrowed an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- by issuing the Cheque which is the subject matter. The Trial Court convicted and sentenced the accused to pay an amount of Rs.2,05,000/- and in re
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
