Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MR ASHOK S.KINAGI, J
JANAB KHALEEMULLA – Appellant
Versus
S. RAJENDRA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff claims ownership of property. (Para 3) |
| 2. court hears and examines parties' arguments. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. termination of agency by principal's death. (Para 10 , 14 , 16 , 18) |
| 4. court confirms lower court's judgment. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
2. For convenience, the parties are referred to based on their rankings before the trial Court. The appellant was defendant No.1; respondent No.1 was the plaintiff and respondent No.2 was defendant No.2.
The plaintiff filed a suit against the defendants for a declaration to declare that the plaintiff is absolute owner in possession of the suit property that the registered sale deed dated 26.05.2006, executed in favour of defendant No.1, by defendant No.2 regarding the suit schedule property is not binding on the plaintiff and for the consequential relief of permanent injunction.
3.2. The defendant No.1 filed a written statement stating that the suit is not maintainable either in law or on facts, and that the suit is liable to be dismissed. Defendant No.1 denied the averments made in the plaint and contended that no cause of action arose for the plaintiff to file the suit. It is contended that the late ChikkeGowda
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
