Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MR ASHOK S.KINAGI, J
SRI. C. MANJUNATH – Appellant
Versus
K.M. VRUNDAMMA, SUNITHA K S, K N LAKSHMIKANTHA REDDY, K N SARITHA, K N SRINIVASA REDDY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of agreement and claims regarding contract nature. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments regarding readiness and the nature of the transaction. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 3. admissibility of oral evidence against written contract. (Para 20 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. court's ruling on contractual obligation enforceability. (Para 24 , 25) |
| 5. final order and decree adjustments. (Para 26) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
2. For convenience, the parties are referred to, based on their ranking before the trial Court. The Appellant was the plaintiff, and the respondents were the defendants.
The plaintiff filed a suit against the defendants for specific performance of contract. It is the case of the plaintiff that, the defendants are the owners and possessors of the suit schedule property. On 10.04.2008, for family and legal necessity, they agreed to sell the same to the plaintiff for a sale consideration Rs.7,50,000/-, received Rs.1,00,000/- as an advance sale consideration, agreed to receive the balance sale consideration of Rs.6,50,000/-, and execute a registered sale deed in favour of the plaintiff conveying the ownership of the suit schedule property, and hand over the possession of the suit schedule property, wit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
