IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1751 OF 2014 (INJ)

BETWEEN:

1. SMT. PUTTAMMA W/O LATE CHENNAIAH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS

2. SRI. RAMANNA S/O LATE CHENNAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

3. SRI. C.CHANDRAPPA S/O LATE CHENNAIAH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT KEREGUDDAHALLI VILLAGE YESHWANTHPURA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-562 110.

…APPELLANTS (BY SMT. RADHA .R, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])

Digitally signed by AL BHAGYA AND:

Location: HI GH COURT OF SMT SIDDALINGAMMA KARNATAKA SINCE DEAD BY LRS

1. SMT. MANGALAMMA W/O BASAVARAJU D/O LATE SIDDALINGAMMA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS RESIDING AT KEMPAPUR HESARAGHATTAHOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-560 088.

2. SMT. NAGAMMA S/O SHIVAKUMRA D/O LATE SIDDALINGAMMA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS RESIDING AT:

KEREGUDDAHALLI VILLAGE YESHWANTHAPURA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-562 110.

3. SMT. CHANDRAMMA W/O SHIVAKUMAR D/O LATE SIDDALINGAMMA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS RESIDING AT:

CHIKKABANAVARA VILLAGE BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-560 090.

4. SMT. NAGAMMA W/O RAJASHEKAR D/O LATE SIDDALINGAMMA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS RESIDING AT:

KUCHAPPANAPETE, TERINABEEDI DODDABALLAPURA BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-561 203.

5. SRI. K.S. ESWARAIAH S/O LATE SOMAIAH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS

6. SRI. K.S.MAHADEVAIAH S/O LATE SOMAIAH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT KEMPAPURA VILAGE HESARAGHATTA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-560 088.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. SHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R6)

THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.9.2014 PASSED IN R.A.NO.115/2008 ON THE FILE OF PRESIDING OFFICER, FAST TRACK COURT-II, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.02.2008 PASSED IN OS.NO.126/2000 ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL II CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.), BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI

ORAL JUDGMENT

None appears for appellants.

2. Learned counsel for appellants has filed memo for retirement on 17.07.2021 along with acknowledgment of appellant for having received entire appeal papers with NOC vakalath.

3. Till date, alternate arrangement is not made.

4. Memo for retirement is accepted.

5. In view of above, appeal is dismissed for non-

prosecution. Pending applications, if any, do not survive for consideration.

Sd/-

(RAVI V HOSMANI)

JUDGE NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23