Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MR N S SANJAY GOWDA, J
SMT. JAIBUNNISA W/O. LATE SYED MOHAMMED SHA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim for revenue record mutation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. discussion on appeals and orders passed. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's role in revising orders. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. interconnected nature of claims. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. challenge against deputy commissioner's order. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 6. arguments on registered sale deed. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. fraud allegations in registration. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 8. improper service in legal procedures. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 9. transformation of claims in litigation. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 10. court equity in administrative justice. (Para 26 , 27) |
| 11. modification of deputy commissioner's ruling. (Para 28 , 29) |
| 12. restoration of previous revenue records. (Para 30 , 31) |
| 13. independence of further claims. (Para 32) |
| 14. recalling and restoration of petition. (Para 33 , 34) |
| 15. final disposals of related writ petitions. (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
ORAL ORDER
2. The Tahsildar considered the said request of the Assistant Commissioner and came to the conclusion that though there was an order dated 03.09.2002 conferring occupancy rights in favour of Syed Mohammed Shah, it was noticed that Form-10 had not been issued by the Land Tribunal and on examination of documen
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
