SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 32220

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MR SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J
MR. THIMMAIAH, S/O.MOLLEBETTEGOWDA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO. 7378 OF 2025 | W.P.No.8502/2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI SATHYA. M. N
For the Respondents: SRI YOGESH D NAIK, SRI T.L KIRAN KUMAR, SRI D HARSHA

Eligibility disputes in cooperative elections should be resolved post-election under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, not through immediate judicial intervention.

Headnote:(A) Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - Section 70(2) - Writ petition for inclusion of names in eligible voters list - Court allows petitioners to vote in society elections on condition votes are kept separate until results are clarified, referring to precedent on ineligibility disputes. (Paras 2 and 4)

(B) Election Conduct - Court emphasizes that disputes regarding eligibility should proceed according to the provisions set out in the Act after results are announced. (Paras 2 and 3)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners, having been declared ineligible, sought the inclusion of their names in the voter list to participate in upcoming society elections. The court allowed their votes to be cast but kept separate pending resolution of eligibility.

Findings of Court:
The Returning Officer must announce results considering votes from the petitioners, with any future disputes to be addressed following the Act’s provisions.

Issues: Court addressed the legality of casting votes despite ineligibility declarations and proper procedural recourse for election disputes.

Ratio Decidendi: The court affirmed previous findings that irregularities in elections should lead to disputes being resolved post-election as per the Act, preserving the petitioners' voting rights.

Result: Writ petition disposed of.

Table of Content
1. eligibility of voters in elections (Para 1)
2. remedy for electoral disputes (Para 2)
3. precedent applies to current case (Para 3)
4. order for election results and vote handling (Para 4)

ORAL ORDER

1. This Court by way of various interim orders had permitted the petitioners who were declared to be ineligible voters to cast their vote in the elections of the Society, subject to the result of the writ petition and that the votes cast by the petitioners shall be kept in separate ballot boxes.

2. A Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of H.S.Raju vs. State of Karnataka & others , [W.P.No.8502/2022 dated 7.6.2022] has after considering the matter in detail come to a categorical conclusion that any irregularity in the conduct of election a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India would not be the proper remedy any dispute as regards the eligibility or ineligibility and the deficiencies in finalization of final electoral list, could only be considered in a dispute raised as regard the election under Section 70 (2) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 after the announcement of the results by counting even the votes cast by the petitioners.

3. The said judgment not having been challenged and having attained finality, the fact being more or less similar would equally apply to the present matter.

4. In that view of the matter, I pass the following:

ORDER

i. The Writ Petition is disposed of

ii. The Returning Officer is directed to announce the result within seven days of the receipt of a copy of this order by taking into account the votes cast by the petitioners in the above matter.

iii. In the event of any proceeding being filed in relation to the results of the election under Section 70 (2) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 , all the contentions raised herein and any that may be raised are left open for consideration in accordance with the applicable law, this court has not expressed any opinion on those issues.

iv. The votes cast by the respective petitioners which had been directed to be kept in separate box shall continue to be retained in a separate box until the disposal of the dispute if any raised within the time frame prescribed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top