Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
H.P.SANDESH, J
VELU S/O BYATAPPA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of charges and convictions against the appellants based on preparation to commit dacoity. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. discussion of inconsistencies in the prosecution's evidence and the credibility of witness testimonies. (Para 10 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. evaluation of the trial court's decision and appellate review leading to acquittal. (Para 15 , 20 , 22) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
These two appeals are filed by accused Nos.1 and 2 challenging the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 26.02.2013 passed in S.C.No.817/2012.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties.
3. The factual matrix of the case of the prosecution before the Trial Court that PW3 has received the credible information that these two accused along with other accused persons making the preparation to commit dacoity. On the said information, they went to the spot and observed that some persons are making preparation and hence, raid was conducted on 01.07.2011 at 9.30 p.m. near Neelagiri plantation compound, Kenadiyan school road, Yelahanka, Bengaluru also charges leveled against the accused persons that all of them belongs to a gang of persons assembled for the purpose of habitually committing
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
