Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
R. NATARAJ, J
SHOBHA C – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's background and claims of harassment. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's allegations against the icc and violations of posh act. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's jurisdiction and limitations on reviewing icc findings. (Para 5 , 6 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. procedural guidelines under the posh act. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. court's dismissal of the petition due to lack of maintainability. (Para 20 , 21) |
ORAL ORDER
(ii) She has also sought for compensation for non-constitution of ICC in accordance with Section 26 of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (for short 'POSH Act, 2013'). She has also sought for a writ in the nature of mandamus to declare that the respondent Nos.6 with the aid of respondent Nos.7 to 12 have allowed the perpetrator to go scot-free and to direct the respondent No.1 to initiate suitable disciplinary action against the respondent Nos.6 to 12.
(iv) She has also sought for a writ in the nature of mandamus to declare that the repeated transfer of the petitioner to Yadgiri and thereafter to Vijayapura is malicious, bad in law and violates her fundamental rights. She has also sought for a writ in the nature of mandamus t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
