Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
M. NAGAPRASANNA, J
MUDE RAVIKANTH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court establishes factual context of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's observations on procedural matters. (Para 3 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. arguments presented on legality of evidence. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. need for reliable forensic process emphasized. (Para 12 , 18 , 20 , 22) |
| 5. court outlines necessary standards for testing. (Para 19 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. writ petition allowed and charges quashed. (Para 26 , 27) |
CAV ORDER
The petitioners/accused 8, 16, 23, 46, 69, 71, 76, 77, 78, and 85 in Special Case No.741 of 2024 are at the doors of this Court calling in question filing of charge sheet and all further proceedings before the VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural registered for offences punishable under Sections 8(c), 21(b), 22(a), 22(b), 22(c), 27(a), 27(b) 29 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (‘the Act’ for short) read with Section 14 of the Foreigners Act and Section 29 0 and 294 of the IPC .
2. Facts, in brief, germane are as follows:
On the night of 19-05-2024 it is stated that the first informant receives credible information that there was a rave party by name of Vasu’s Birthday with the quote “sunrise to sunset victory”
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
