Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J
SMT. THARA PEETHAMBARAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. importance of jurisdictional rules in investigation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments surrounding procedural legality regarding investigation. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. judicial discretion in investigation orders under cr.p.c. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. nature of further investigation vs. re-investigation. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. clear distinction in legal definitions relevant to investigation procedures. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. final ruling on procedural adherence and consequences. (Para 16 , 17) |
ORAL ORDER
The petitioners-accused Nos.1 and 2 are at the doors of this Court, yet again calling in question an order passed by the concerned Court directing re/further investigation under Section 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and submit a report by 23.05.2025.
2. Heard Sri.C.V.Nagesh, learned Senior Counsel for Sri.Raghavendra K., learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Sri.B.N.Jagadeesha, Addl. SPP along with Sri.Chamappa Erappa, learned HCGP for respondent No.1, Sri.Bhargav K.S., learned counsel for respondent No.2.
3. The petitioner No.1 is the mother of petitioner No.2 and the complainant. Therefore, the rift is between the members of the family. A private complain
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
