Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J
SHRI. TEJAS H. – Appellant
Versus
CHANDANA B M THE INSPECTOR OF CUSTOMS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of case and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding no incriminating evidence against petitioners. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. legal standards for seizure and testing of narcotic substances. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. final order quashing complaints against petitioners. (Para 22) |
ORAL ORDER
“1. To quash the complaint filed by Respondent in Spl.C.C.No.1466/2024 which is pending on the file of Hon’ble XXXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge for NDPS Cases, Bangalore and Order or Cognizance and issue of summons dated: 13.08.2024 as barred by Limitation as per Annexure-‘B’ and ‘C’, which is arising out of GEN/INV/OTH/78/2022-HPU-O/o-Commr-
2. To quash the complaint filed in Spl.C.C.No.1466/2024 on the file of Hon’ble XXXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge for NDPS Cases, Bangalore for Offence U/s 22(a), 23(a), 27, 28 and 29 of NDPS Act, which is arising out of file No.GEN/INV/OTH/78/2022-HPU-O/o-Commr-City Bangalore as per Annexure-‘A’ as an abuse of process of law.
4. To quash the entire proceedings initiated in Spl.C.C.No.1466/2024 on the file of Hon’ble XXXIII Additional City Civil and S
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
