Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
T.M.NADAF, J
MR. PRAKASHA K. P. – Appellant
Versus
MR. GIRISH G – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dismissal of compensation claim based on fir delay. (Para 2 , 10) |
| 2. court observations on prior judgments and procedures. (Para 4 , 7) |
| 3. arguments around fir delay justification and trial outcomes. (Para 5 , 8 , 11) |
| 4. court's reasoning on burden of proof and delay considerations. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. final decision and orders concerning case proceedings. (Para 14) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
2. This appeal is filed calling in question the Judgment and Award dated 09.08.2019, in MVC No.1408/2017 passed by the Additional Senior Civil Judge, MACT, Srirangapatna, dismissing the claim petition.
Whether the Tribunal is justified in dismissing the claim petition only on the premise that there is a delay of
4. Heard Sri.Gunashekar, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Smt.Manjula Tejaswi, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3 –
5. Sri.Gunashekar, learned counsel taking this Court through the judgment with all vehemence submitted that only on the premise that there is a delay of 14 days in lodging the complaint before the police and that the appellants have not properly explained the reason for not giving First Information Report after the discharge from the hospital, the Tri
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
