SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 33675

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
DR. K.MANMADHA RAO, J
SMT SHANAZ W/O SHOUKATH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS – Appellant
Versus
SRI PATLIAH S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO. 24708 OF 2022 (GM-CPC)



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. NAVEED AHMED

Dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn due to the underlying suit's dismissal.

Headnote:This judgment reviews a writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 09.11.2022 of the XIX Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge in O.S. No. 5538/2021. The court notes that the underlying suit was dismissed on 06.03.2025, rendering the current petition moot. The counsel for the petitioners indicated that, in light of this dismissal, the petition should be withdrawn. Consequently, the court dismisses the writ petition as withdrawn.

Table of Content
1. writ petition challenging prior order. (Para 1)
2. dismissal of petition as withdrawn. (Para 2 , 3)

ORAL ORDER

Learned counsel Sri.Naveed Ahmed, appearing for the petitioners submits that this petition is filed seeking to set aside the impugned order passed on I.A.No.2/2022 in O.S.No.5538/2021 on the file of XIX Addl.City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-18). Now, suit itself was dismissed on 06.03.2025 and in view of the dismissal of the suit, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. Hence, he prayed for dismissal of this writ petition as withdrawn.

2. The memo is placed on record.

3. In view of the memo, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top