SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 33767

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
E.S. Indiresh, J
MR. KUSH SHAH – Appellant
Versus
M/S. FLYYX TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD. – Respondent
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 521 OF 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: AJAY SHANKAR, ADITI P GOUDAR

Non-compliance with court's procedural requirements can lead to dismissal of petitions for non-prosecution under applicable arbitration laws.

Headnote:The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was invoked by the petitioner to appoint an arbitrator to resolve disputes as per Clause 18 of the SHA dated 10.03.2022. However, the court observed that compliance with office objections was not fulfilled, leading to the dismissal of the petition for non-prosecution. The final order stated, 'the petition is hereby dismissed for non-prosecution.'

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following order.

ORAL ORDER

Finally, one week time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the petition stands dismissed for non-

prosecution, without reference to the Bench.

Sd/-

JUDGE …5 NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 12.08.2025, the office objections are not complied with, hence, the petition is hereby dismissed for non-prosecution.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top