SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 3

MYSORE HIGH COURT
A. R. Somanatha Iyer, A. Ahmed Ali Khan , JJ.
Revanna M. R. v. Mysore Revenue Appellate Tribunal Bangalore


1. On June 30, 1967, the Regional Transport Authority, Chittoor, in the State of Andhra Pradesh, granted a permit to respondent 3 to operate his stage carriage on an inter - State route between Tumkur and Thirupathi which is in the State of Mysore. Part of that route between Mulbagal and Doddaballapura which lies within the State of Mysore, became a notified route under a Scheme called the Kolar Scheme which was published on January 25, 1968, after it received approval under S.68 - D of the Motor Vehicles Act.

2. Meanwhile, respondent 3 had made an application to the State Transport Authority, Bangalore, on September 5, 1967, for its counter - signature under S.63 of the Motor vehicles Act in respect of the route which was within the Mysore State. That counter - signature became necessary by reason of the provision contained in S.63(1) of the Act that a permit granted by one State shall have no validity in another State unless it is counter - signed by the concerned Transport Authority of that State.

3. But, the Mysore State Transport Authority by an order made by it on March 2, 1968, refused counter - signature on the basis of the exclusion of private operators from the nationali



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top