SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 4

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
V. Jagannathan, J.
State of Karnataka v. Richard alias Aruldas and Another


1 This appeal has been heard after the matter was remanded to this Court by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Cri. A. No. 969/2007. This Court on the earlier occasion disposed of this appeal by its judgment dated 6-7-2006 and the matter was taken to the Apex Court by the second appellant (accused No. 4 before the Trial Court), as this Court had convicted him for the offence punishable under S.333 and 452 of IPC and sentenced him to one year RI and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/-. Following the order passed by the Apex Court remanding the matter, this Court heard the learned counsel for the parties on 25-1-2008 and posted the matter for further hearing today.

2 The learned Government Pleader Shri Honnappa completed the arguments on behalf of the appellant / State. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted his reply.

3 While remanding the matter to this Court, the Apex Court had observed thus :
"Learned counsel for the respondent does not object to setting aside of the order in terms of order dated 14-5-2007. Accordingly, the order is set aside and the case is remitted back to the High Court for the passing of appropriate order in accordance with law after affording due opportunities of




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top