SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 10

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
H. G. Ramesh, J.
Wahab S. A. v. Karnataka State Transport Authority Bangalore and Others


1. Whether the petitioner is entitled for grant of countersignatures by the Karnataka State Transport Authority to the two permits granted to him in the State of Kerala is the question that arises for determination in these writ petitions.

2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the impugned order dated 3-11-2012 (Annexure V) passed by the Karnataka State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore.

3. Facts in brief : The petitioner was granted Stage Carriage Permits bearing No. 43 / STA / 86 and No. 44 / STA / 86 for the two routes namely Thalangara to Mangalore & Parasinakadavu to Mangalore respectively. It is not in dispute that the aforesaid permits relating to the two routes were operative till 4-8-2009 & 15-10-2009 respectively. The petitioner applied for renewal of the said permits before the Kerala State Transport Authority. The Kerala State Transport Authority renewed both the permits for a period of five years; from 5-8-2009 to 4-8-2014 in respect of permit No. 43 and from 16-10-2009 to 15-10-2014 in respect of permit No. 44. When the said permits were submitted to the Karnataka State Transport Authority for countersignatures, the Karnatak

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top