SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 17

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Pradeep D. Waingankar, J.
Devendra D. K. v. Venkatesh H.


1. The revision petitioner has been convicted for the offence punishable under S.138 of NI Act by the XXIII Addl. CMM, Mayo Hall Unit, Bangalore in CC No. 26373/2008 by order dated 26/11/2009, which has been confirmed by the Fast Track Court - III, Bangalore City in Crl. A No. 25145/2009 by O.08/04/2010. Questioning the legality and correctness of the orders passed by both the Courts below, this revision petition is preferred under S.397 r/w 401, CrPC.

2. The petitioner was the accused and the respondent was the complainant before the Magistrate. Towards repayment of the consideration amount, the accused issued a cheque for Rs.5.00 lakhs on 30/04/2007 drawn on Andhra Bank, Cooke Town Branch, Bangalore in favour of the complainant. On presentation of the cheque, it came to be dishonoured with an endorsement 'insufficient funds. The complainant informed the factum of dishonour of the cheque to the accused by issuance of legal notice by RPAD and called upon to pay the cheque amount. There was no response from the accused. So a complaint came to be filed against the accused for the offence punishable under S.138 of NI Act. The accused having pleaded not guilty to the charges levelled a


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top