SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 15

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
*Mohan Shantanagoudar, Budihal R. B., JJ.
Venkatesha alias Poori and Others v. State of Karnataka


1. The judgment and order of conviction dated 30.09.2011 passed by the Fast Track Court, Bhadravathi, in SC No. 108/2009 is called in question in these two appeals. The accused appellants were tried and convicted for the offences punishable under S.143, S.148, S.302 read with S.149 of IPC by the Court below. Criminal Appeal No. 1224/2011 is filed by accused Nos. 3 to 6; where as Criminal appeal No. 1183/2011 is filed by accused Nos. 1 and 2.

2. Case of the prosecution in brief is that accused are belonging to one particular caste and whereas the deceased is from another caste; since more than 10 years, the youngsters from the caste of the accused used to tease the ladies / girls belonging to the caste of the deceased. In that regard, the deceased and others were not only requesting the caste members of the accused but were taking action against them by lodging the complaint; they had even quarrelled with each other; despite such repeated attempts by the deceased and his fellow men, the community people of the accused did not stop. It is further case of the prosecution that the accused being the youngsters of the particular caste and influenced by the talks heard by them from their
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top