SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2995

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
B. Veerappa, J
Shivakumar alias Kumara S. P. v. S. G. Kathyayiniyamma and Another


1. The unsuccessful defendant No. 1 filed the present writ petition against the order, dated 16.9.2016 passed in M.A. 63/2014 dismissing the appeal filed by the defendant confirming the order, dated 10.6.2014 passed on IA filed under O.39, R.1 and R.2 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed in O.S.No.110/2013 granting temporary injunction.

2. The 1st respondent, who is the plaintiff before the trial Court filed O.S. 110/2013 for permanent injunction against the petitioner and 2nd respondent, who are defendants for permanent injunction in respect of suit schedule property, on the basis of the grant certificate and the Will said to have been executed by the mother of the plaintiff and also on the basis of RTC extract, tax paid receipt, mutation and the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner. The same was resisted by the 1st defendant by filing written statement denying the plaint averments and contended that the plaintiff's mother Parvathamma executed a sale deed in favour of Mallanna on 21.10.1974 and the said Mallanna permitted the 1st defendant to cultivate the land and defendant is in possession of the same and seeks for dismissal of the Suit.

3. Plaintiff also filed LA under O

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top