SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
R. Devdas, J.
Sharadabai v. State of Karnataka


1. Though notice sent to respondent No.3 Gram Panchayat is awaited, having regard to the fact that for deciding the case on hand, the presence of the third respondent may not be necessary, therefore, with the consent of the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned HCGP, the matter is taken up for Final Disposal.

2. The petitioner who was elected as the Adhyaksha of the third respondent - Gram Panchayat on 04.02.2021 is before this Court, aggrieved of the impugned meeting notice dated 13.05.2022 issued by the second respondent - Assistant Commissioner, Harapanahalli, Vijayanagar District.

3. A representation dated 11.05.2022 is said to have been given by 15 members of the Gram Panchayat to the Assistant Commissioner, requesting for holding a meeting to consider motion of No - Confidence against the Adhyakasha. The Assistant Commissioner, having satisfied himself as to the requirement contemplated under R.3 of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Motion of No Confidence Against Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Grama Panchayat) Rules, 1994, (hereinafter referred to as ''the Rules'' for the sake of brevity) issued the impugned notice dated 13.05.2022, fixing the meeting for consideration





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top