SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 34202

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
MR. MAHESH. B. R. – Appellant
Versus
ATLANTIC DATA BUREAU SERVICES PVT. LTD – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT

The appeal is filed by the appellant/defendant questioning the order dated 12.04.2021 passed on I.A.No.III filed under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 & 6 read with Section 151 of CPC in O.S.No.223/2020 on the file of III Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Mangaluru, Dakshina Kannada1, whereby the schedule properties A, B and C are attached.

2. It is case of the plaintiff that the appellant/defendant is the employee of the plaintiff/ respondent Company. The defendant has appointed as Team Lead - Finance with the salary of Rs.36,020/-. The allegation against the appellant/defendant that he has misappropriate sum of Rs.4,09,29,935/-. Therefore, filed hereinafter referred to as ‘the Trial Court’ for short the suit for mandatory injunction directing the defendant to pay sum of Rs.4,09,29,935/- with the plaintiff company with interest at the rate of 12% p.a., from the date of suit till realization. Also the plaintiff has filed IA No.III under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 & 6 of CPC praying for conditional order of attachment before judgment of movable and immovable properties as shown in scheduled A, B and C before judgment. The trial Court has allowed I.A.No.III by passing order of attac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top