SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 34393

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
RAVI V HOSMANI
MRS VEENA DAMODAR – Appellant
Versus
SRI BALAKRISHNA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 603 OF 2017 BETWEEN:

MRS.VEENA DAMODAR, W/O DAMODHARA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/A SANNIDHI, ASSAI COLONY PANCHANADY, MANAGALURU - 575 006.

…PETITIONER (BY SRI HAREESH BHANDRARY T., ADVOCATE)

AND:

SRI BALAKRISHNA, S/O KESHAVA PATIL, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT DEEKSHA, RAJKAMAL LAYOUT, Digitally signed JEPPINAMOGARU, by ANUSHA V MANGALURU - 575 006.

Location: High …RESPONDENT Court of Karnataka (BY SRI GIRISH M.V., ADVOCATE FOR SRI NISHIT KUMAR SHETTY, ADVOCATE)

THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397(2) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION DATED 14.03.2016 PASSED BY J.M.F.C.-IV COURT, MANGALURU IN C.C.NO.740/2014 AND JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 17.04.2017 PASSED BY THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, D.K., MANGALURU, IN CRL.A.NO.79/2016 AND ACQUIT PETITIONER.

THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI

ORAL ORDER

Challenging judgment dated 17.04.2017 passed by IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, D.K., Mangaluru, in Crl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top