SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 34584

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR. SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR, J
MR. DHANUSH V. S/O VENKATESH K.C – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA HAL POLICE STATION – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: S. RAJ PRABHU
For the Respondents: SMT. PUSHPALATHA B.

Table of Content
1. counsel for petitioner requests to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition. (Para 1)
2. petitioner indicates registration of new fir and requests dismissal with liberty. (Para 2)
3. court grants withdrawal and permits filing of a new petition. (Para 3)

ORAL ORDER

2. The memo reads thus:

Wherefore, the Petitioner pray that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to dismiss this petition as WITHDRAWN WITH LIBERTY TO FILE FRESH PETITION, in the interest of justice and equity."

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top