Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR. M.NAGAPRASANNA, J
RAJLAXMI MARKETING, SHOP NO.7/B APMC YARD, DAM ROAD, HOSPET-583 201, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SMT. MAMTHA W/O. HIRALAL JAIN – Appellant
Versus
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER S OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (LGSTO-500), HARIHAR HOSPET-583 231 – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. hearing of petitioner and consideration of arguments. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. review of discrepancies in gst filings. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. affirmation of corrective measures based on a circular. (Para 8 , 9) |
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)
1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsels representing the respondents.
2. The learned counsel Ms. Umera appearing for the petitioner would give up the prayer qua the constitutional validity of Section 16 (2) of the CGST Act.
3. The submission is placed on record.
4. For the rest of the issue that remains, the counsel for the petitioner submits that it is already considered by this Court in W.P. No.108748/2025 disposed of on 24.11.2025. The same reads as follows:
1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following prayer:
a. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or quashing the order-in- appeal dated 29-03-2025 passed by the respondent-1 order-in-appeal No.BGM-JJ- ADC-229-2024-25-GST and vide Annexure-A and quash the adjudication order bearing No.BEL-CGST-000-HUB-SUP-RHB-08-2023- 24 dated 07-12-2023 passed by the respondent -2 and vide Annexure –B.
b. And
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
