ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)

1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following prayer.

“WHEREFOR the petitioner respectfully prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased”

No.4, Ashray Plot, Shiggaon. The ninth respondent is appointed as Anganwadi Helper in the aforesaid Anganvadi Kendra. The petitioner is before the Court calling the said appointment in question on the score that the petitioner is more meritorious than the appointed candidate.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would project the solitary circumstance of merit as is averred in the petition, as his submission.

5. Learned HCGP appearing for the State would submit that the petitioner did not upload the domicile certificate and therefore, a less meritorious candidate was chosen in the absence of domicile certificate. The certificates of the appointed candidate were in order. Therefore, the appointment was made in favour of the appointed candidate.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner would join the issue in submission that the petitioner while filing the objections had filed the domicile certificate along with the objections. Therefore, prior to the selection, when it was in