Karnataka HC Notices Sri Lankan Judge's Rights Plea
07 Mar 2026
Karnataka Proposes Social Media Ban for Under-16s
07 Mar 2026
Justice Dharmadhikari Sworn In as 55th Madras HC Chief Justice
07 Mar 2026
Punjab HC Acquits Ram Rahim in Journalist Murder
07 Mar 2026
Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ANU SIVARAMAN AND VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
SRI C NAGARAJ – Appellant
Versus
SMT GEETHA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 520 OF 2021 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
SRI C NAGARAJ S/O LATE CHANNAPPA @ CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT NO 138, BENGALURU THOTADA MANE REDIHALLI ROAD, KASABA HOBLI BANGARPET TALUK-563 114.
…APPELLANT (BY SRI. LOKESH BOOVANAHALLI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT. GEETHA Digitally W/O SRINIVASAN K signed by RUPA V D/O N KANCHANAMALA Location: AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS High Court Of Karnataka
2. SMT. N KANCHANAMALA W/O HANUMANTHARAJU AGE ABOUT 73 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT NO 40 NRI LAYOUT, PHASE 2
12TH CROSS GREEN GARDEN RAMAMURTHY NAGAR POST BENGALURU - 560 016.
…RESPONDENTS (R1 & R2 SERVICE OF NOTICE BY WAY OF PAPER PUBLICATION-DULY SERVED(SERVICE HELD SUFFICIEN
Injunctions require proof of a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and risk of irreparable harm; previous rejections do not preclude new applications with distinct claims.
The burden of proof is on the plaintiff to prove fraud, and complete particulars of fraud must be stated in the pleadings. A registered deed of sale carries a presumption of genuineness, and the onus....
Proper party inclusion is essential in property disputes, and claims of fraud must be substantiated by convincing evidence.
A party alleging fraud must provide specific evidence to substantiate claims, and registered documents have a presumption of validity, which must be rebutted.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article