IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3^RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1772 OF 2022 (PAR)

BETWEEN:

1. SRI. K. RADHAKRISHNA, S/O LATE DR. G. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT NO.1117, BCCHS LAYOUT, BAYANAPALYA, KANAKAPURA ROAD, BENGALURU-560062.

…APPELLANT (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. SMT. S. RASHMI, D/O LATE K. SRINIVAS, Digitally signed AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.

by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH

2. SRI. S. PRASANTH, COURT OF S/O LATE K. SRINIVAS, KARNATAKA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS.

3. SMT. S. SUSHMA, D/O LATE K. SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS.

RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 3 ARE RESIDING AT NO.2617, 1^ST FLOOR, VALMEEKI ROAD, VONTIKOPPAL, 4. SRI. K. RAMAKRISHNA, S/O LATE DR. G. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.1566, 2^ND CROSS, HOSAKERI, K.R. MOHALLA, MYSURU-570004.

5. SMT. K. GAYATHRI, W/O K.V. NARASIMHA, D/O LATE DR. G. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.252, EWS 1^ST STAGE, KUVEMPUNAGAR, MYSURU-570023.

6. SRI. K. GOPALAKRISHNA, S/O LATE DR. G. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.144, 3^RD CROSS, NIVEDITHANAGARA, MYSURU-570022.

7. SRI. K. RAMESH, S/O LATE DR. K. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.427, 14^TH CROSS, ‘G’ BLOCK, R.K. NAGAR, MYSURU-570024.

8. SMT. K. DRAKSHAYANI, W/O M.R. RAMESH, D/O LATE DR. G. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.1707, 1^ST CROSS, SEETHARAM RAO MAIN ROAD, HALLINA BEEDHI, K.R.MOHALLA, …RESPONDENTS R4 - SERVED)

THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.08.2022 PASSED IN R.A.NO.347/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE VII ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MYSURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.03.2021 PASSED IN O.S.NO.146/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MYSURU.

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

ORAL JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal as the appellant does not intend to prosecute the appeal.

2. In terms of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

(H.P.SANDESH)

JUDGE MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1