IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1694 OF 2025 (U/S 14(A) (2))

BETWEEN:

SRI SRISHANTH @ SRIKANTH @ APPU S/O LATE HARISH AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS R/AT AVATHI VILLAGE, VIJAYAPUR HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT 562110.

…APPELLANT (BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA P.H., ADV.)

AND:

1. STATE BY CHIKKAJALA P.S.

REPTD. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560001.

Digitally signed by 2. MR. RANGANATHA LAKSHMINARAYAN N Location: HIGH S/O SUBBANNA COURT OF KARNATAKA AGED ABOUTN 47 YEARS, R/AT NEAR DODDAMMA TEMPLE, HUNASAMARNAHALLI VILLAGE & POST, YELAHANKA TALUK, BANGALORE CITY - 562157.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RANGASWAMY R., HCGP FOR R1, VIDE COURT ORDER DATED: 04.11.2025 NOTICE TO R2 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)

THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S 14(A)2) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATE 04.06.2025 IN CRL.MISC.NO.3892/2025 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 87, 64(2)(M), 65(1) OF BNS SEC.5(L),6 OF POCSO ACT 2012 UNDER SEC.3(2)(v) OF PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES ACT 1989 PASS BY THE COURT OF HON'BLE COURT OF THE FTSC IV ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGALURU AND ENLARGE HIM ON BAIL IN CR.NO.240/2024 REGISTERED BY CHIKKAJALA P.S. PENDING ON THE FILE OF HON'BLE CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE AT BENGALURU FTSC-IV.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA

ORAL JUDGMENT

Appellant has preferred this appeal against the order dated 04^th June, 2025 passed in Crl. Misc.No.3892 of 2025 by the FTSC-IV Additional District and Sessions Judge at Bengaluru and enlarge him on bail in Crime No.240 of 2024 registered by Chikkajala Police station.

2. Brief facts leading to this appeal are that, on the basis of the complaint filed by Ranganatha, Chikkajala Police registered Crime No.240 of 2024 against the accused for commission of offence punishable under Section 87 of BNS- 2023. After investigation, Investigating Officer submitted charge sheet under Sections 64(2)(m), 65(1), 87 of BNS-2023 and under Sections 5(L) and 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012; and under Section 3(2)(v) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Accused was arrested on 06^th December, 2024 and was remanded to judicial custody. Till this date, accused is in judicial custody. Bail application was filed under Section 483 of BNSS-2023, came to be rejected by the trial Court on 04^th June, 2025. Being aggrieved by the rejection of bail application, the appellant/accused has preferred this appeal.

3. Sri Raghavendra P.H., learned counsel appearing for the appellant/accused would submit that the accused has not committed any offence as alleged against him. The Investigating Officer has produced the victim before the Magistrate for recording statement under Section 183 of BNSS- 2023, in which she has not stated anything against the accused. During the course of cross-examination of PW1 while recording statement under Section 183 of BNSS-2023, she has not deposed anything against this accused. Victim has not been subjected to medical examination as the victim has refused to undergo medical examination. Since the evidence of victim has already been recorded, the question of tampering or threatening the victim does not arise. The accused is in judicial custody for nearly ten months now and the accused in ready to abide to any of the conditions which may be imposed by this Court. On all these grounds, it is sought to allow the appeal.

4. As against this, Sri R. Rangaswamy, learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State would submit that as per the birth certificate, the victim was minor at the time of alleged incident. PW1 has supported the prosecution case in her examination-in-chief. There are no grounds to interfere with the impugned order passed by the trial Court. On all these grounds, it is sought to dism