IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 591 OF 2013 (DEC/INJ)

BETWEEN:

1. SRI RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS S/O LATE SIDDAPPA AGRICULTURIST RESIDENT OF RAMAJJANAHALLI VILLAGE MADALAKERE HOBLI HOSADURGA TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 501 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. B.M. SIDDAPPA, ADVOCATE)

AND:

Digitally 1. SMT NAGAMMA signed by SUNITHA K S AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS Location:

HIGH COUR T W/O SIDDAPPA OF KARNATAKA

2. SMT RANGAMMA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS W/O PATHALINGAPPA D/O LATE SIDDAPPA RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 2 ARE RESIDENTS OF HOBALAHATTI VILLAGE, TALYA HOBLI HOLALKERE TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 501

3. SMT PUTTAMMA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS W/O RANGASWAMY D/O LATE SIDDAPPA RESIDENT OF KATTARAKATTE VILLAGE HIRIYUR TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 501

4. SMT GIRIJAMMA W/O GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS RESIDENT OF GOLLARAHALLI VILLAGE SRIRAMPURA HOBLI HOSADURGA TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 501

5. SHIVALINGAMMA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS D/O LATE SIDDAPPA 6. SRI PARAMESH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS S/O LATE SIDDAPPA

7. RAVI G AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS S/O LATE SIDDAPPA

8. PRAHALLADAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS S/O LATE SIDDAPPA RESPONDENTS NO.5 TO 8 ARE RESDIENTS OF RAMAJJANAHALLI VILLAGE MADADAKERE HOBLI HOSADURGA TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 501 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. KRISHNAMURTHY M.R., ADVOCATE FOR R8 R3, R4, R5, R6 AND R7 ARE SERVED VIDE ORDER DATED 15.10.2025, SERVICE OF NOTICE TO R1 AND R2 IS HELD SUFFICIENT) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.12.2012 PASSED IN R.A.NO.33/2010 ON THE FILE OF ITINERARAY SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, HOSADURGA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.7.2000 PASSED IN OS.NO.390/1994 ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.), HOSADURGA.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

ORAL JUDGMENT

It is submitted that the sole appellant passed away in the year 2022. The legal representatives of the appellant did not approach the learned counsel for the appellant for filing any application to come on record. As the appellant passed away in the year 2022, the appeal is abated by operation of law.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as abated Sd/-

(ASHOK S.KINAGI)

JUDGE PSJ CT-SG List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1