SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 35429

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
K.MANMADHA RAO
MOHAMMED HAFEEZ @ HAFEEZULLA – Appellant
Versus
SHEIK AHMED – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 935 OF 2017 (MON)

BETWEEN:

MOHAMMED HAFEEZ @ HAFEEZULLA S/O LATE HAJI R MOHAMMED SALEEM SAB AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/O NO. 373/1

1ST MAIN, 11TH CROSS, AZAD NAGAR, DAVANAGERE- 577001 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. R GOPAL., ADVOCATE)

AND:

SHEIK AHMED S/O ABDUL RAZAK SAB AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/O 1ST MAIN, 11TH CROSS, AZAD NAGAR, Digitally signed by VIJAYALAKSHMI DAVANAGERE- 577001 B N …RESPONDENT Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (RESPONDENT SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)

THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DTD 15.02.2017 PASSED IN R.A.NO.12/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE IInd ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANAGERE, DISMISSED THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 25.11.2013 PASSED IN OS.NO.54/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE Ist ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, DAVANAGERE. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO

ORAL JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellant is present and none appears for the respondent.

2. This matter was referr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top