SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 35914

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV
PAULIN D'ALMEIDA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 5793 OF 2023 (LR)

BETWEEN:

1. PAULIN D'ALMEIDA AGED 94 YEAS W/O LATE FRENCIES D'ALMEIDA R/AT BETHEL VILLA, OPP: FATHIMA CHURCH, PEREMPALLI, SHIVALI VILLAGE, POST KUNJIBETTU - 576 102 UDUPI DISTRICT … PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAGAR D NAIDU., ADVOCATE)

Digitally signed by AND:

VIDYA G R Location:

HIGH COURT OF 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 001

2. THE LAND TRIBUNAL UDUPI TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN

3. LATHA S RAO AGED 45 YEARS, D/O LATE SADASHIVA RAO R/AT DOOR NO. 11/3/112 NEAR MAHALINGESHWARA TEMPLE SHIRIBEEDU UDUPI - 576 101 UDUPI DISTRICT … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K PRASANNA SHETTY., ADVOCATE FOR R3;

SRI V. SESHU, HCGP FOR R1 & R2)

***

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 28.10.2022 PASSED IN CASE. NO.LRY77-937-TRI-10479/80-81 ON THE FILED OF THE R-2 LAND TRIBUNAL UDUPI VIDE ANNEXURE-A IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE LAND AND TO DECLARE THE SAME AS UNSUSTAINABLE UNDER LAW AND ETC.

T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top