SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 36085

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
JYOTI M
KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
M S VIJAYAKUMAR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 22797 OF 2021 (L-KSRTC)

BETWEEN:

KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TUMKUR DIVISION, TUMKUR, BY ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER AND DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY, REP. BY CHIEF LAW OFFICER.

…PETITIONER (BY SMT. H.R.RENUKA, ADVOCATE)

AND:

M.S.VIJAYAKUMAR S/O. SHANKAREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O. MAKANAHALLI, Digitally signed VIGNASANTHE POST, by THEJAS KUMAR N NONABINAKERE HOBLI, Location: HIGH TIPTUR TALUK, COURT OF TUMKUR DISTRICT-572224.

KARNATAKA …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M.C. BASAVARAJU., ADVOCATE FOR C/R)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

ORAL ORDER

Smt.H.R.Renuka., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.M.C.Basavaraju., counsel for the respondent have appeared in person.

2. The short facts are these:

The respondent was selected for the post of Driver cum conductor and was placed on training. He remained absent from duty from 05.03.2014 without prior intimation or permission or s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top