SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 36127

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
R. NATARAJ
SHRI PARVEZ AHMAD – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 34093 OF 2025 (LB-BMP)

BETWEEN:

SHRI PARVEZ AHMAD S/O MOHAMMED ARIF AGE ABOUT 44 YEARS OWNER OF SITE NO.232, DHARMA AVENUE, 4TH CROSS VIDYA NAGAR, BHATTARAHALLI BENGALURU-560048 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. TAHIR, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. THE COMMISSIONER BENGALURU EAST CITY CORPORATION GBA BENGALURU-560048 EARLIER DESIGNATED AS ZONAL COMMISSIONER (MAHADEVAPURA ZONE)

Digitally BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, signed by SUMA MAHADEVAPURA, BENGALURU-560048 Location:

HIGH

2. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER COURT OF KARNATAKA AEE OFFICE, BENGALURU EAST CITY CORPORATION GBA BENGALURU-560048 EARLIER DESIGNATED AS HOODI SUB-DIVISION, BBMP MAHADEVAPURA BENGALURU-560048 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PAWAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONER'S REQUISITION DATED 10.11.2025 AT ANNEXURE-A SUBMITTED UNDER SECTION 249 OF THE BBMP ACT, 2020 / GBG ACT, 2024 FOR REGULARIZATION OF CONSTRUCTION ON SITE NOS.231 AND 232, DHARMA AVENUE, BHATTARAHALLI, MAHADEVAPURA ZONE, BENGALUR

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top