THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
SMT. SHEELA – Appellant
Versus
SRI. RAMESH – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 34024 OF 2025 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SMT. SHEELA W/O SHUBHAKAR, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT KARIBEERANAHOSAHALLI VILLAGE, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL - 562 114.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. SATHYA D., ADVOCATE FOR SMT. VANITHA DEVI V.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. RAMESH Digitally S/O LATE VENKATAPPA, signed by SUMA B N AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, Location: R/AT KARIBEERANAHOSAHALLI VILLAGE, HIGH COURT OF HOSAKOTE TALUK, KARNATAKA BENGALURU RURAL - 562 114.
…RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 06.11.2025 ON IA NO. II AT ANNX-J PASSED IN OS NO. 390/2025 BY THE LEARNED PRL. CIVIL JUDGE, JMFC, HOSAKOTE BENGALURU RURAL.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. This Court does not find the need or necessity to issue notice to the respondent/defendant for the reason that in the original suit proceedings initiated by the petitioner aga
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.