IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.128 OF 2023 BETWEEN:

SRI S. SEETHARAM S/O LATE SRI G. SAMPATHIYENGAR, AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS, R/AT NO.9, 1ST 'C' MAIN ROAD VIJAYANAGARA II STAGE, BENGALURU -560040.

…COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. D. P. MAHESH, ADVOCATE)

Digitally signed by AND:

CHANNEG OWDA PREMA Location: High 1. SRI KUMARNAIKA Court of Karnataka THE COMMISSIONER, THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020.

2. SRI. CHIDANAND N.

THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-4, THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BENGALURU -560 020.

…ACCUSED (BY SMT. RAMYA H. N. AND SRI. B.S.KARTHIKEYAN, ADV. FOR A1 & A2(V/C))

THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR HAVING COMMITTED CONTEMPT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT ON ACCOUNT OF WILLFUL AND DELIBERATE DISOBEDIENCE OF DIRECTION ISSUED VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 07.12.2022 PASSED IN W.P.NO.3359/2022 (BDA) VIDE ANNEXURE-D. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL)

This contempt petition is filed alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 07.12.2022 passed in W.P. No.3359/2022.

2. The operative portion of the said order reads as under;

(i) "Petition is hereby allowed.

(ii) Respondents are directed to allot alternative site in favour of petitioner as per representations at Annexures – J, M and N dated 09.06.2016, 17.04.2017 and 14.09.2020, respectively, in accordance with law and in terms of Rule 11-A of the BDA (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1984, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order."

3. The affidavit of compliance filed by the accused indicates that an alternate site has been allotted and sale deed has been executed.

4. In view of the same, contempt proceedings are dropped. Notice issued to the respondents/accused shall stand discharged.

Sd/-

(ANU SIVARAMAN)

JUDGE Sd/-

(VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL)

JUDGE PN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 16