SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 36506

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
R. NATARAJ
SMT. BHAGYAMMA – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 43326 OF 2015 (GM-CC)

BETWEEN:

SMT. BHAGYAMMA W/O VENKATESHARAO AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/O BISILE VILLAGE, AMRUTHURU HOBALI KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT.

…PETITIONER (BY SRI. KASHINATH J.D., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TUMKUR DISTRICT TUMKUR-572101.

2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER Digitally TUMKUR SUB DIVISION signed by SUMA TUMKUR-572101.

Location:

HIGH

3. THE TAHASILDAR COURT OF KARNATAKA KUNIGAL TALUK KUNIGAL, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572101

4. M.C. KRISHNARAJ S/O CHINNAVENKATAIAH AGE : 52 YEARS R/O MANGALA VILLAGE, YEDIYOORU HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572142 AMENDMENT CARRIED OUT AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 12.10.2023 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. C. JAGADISH, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 3 SRI. MAHESH R. UPPIN, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.4)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS FROM THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN RESPECT OF THE VIDE ORDER NO.P.C.R.:CR:02:2015-16 DATED 10.09.2015 ON THE FILE OF THE RESPONDENT NO.3 AND QUASH THE ORDER VIDE NO.P.C.R:CR:02:/2015-16 DATED 10

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top