SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 36634

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
JAYANT BANERJI AND K. V. ARAVIND
MR PRERAK NAVEEN D SA – Appellant
Versus
MRS PRAWAL SALLY MARRI TAURO – Respondent
MFA 1597/2025



MFA No. 5019 of 2025 HC-KAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1597 OF 2025 (IDA)

C/W MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 3711 OF 2025 (IDA) MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5019 OF 2025 (IDA)

IN MFA No. 1597/2025 BETWEEN:

MR PRERAK NAVEEN D’SA S/O FRANCIS D’SA AND LEENA D’SILVA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT NO.3-44, SHALOME BELLE, MOODUBELLE, Digitally signed UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 120 by K G …APPELLANT RENUKAM BA (BY SRI. ASHWIN JOYSTON KUTINHA, ADV.)

Location: HIGH COURT OF AND:

KARNATAKA MRS. PRAWAL SALLY MARRI TAURO D/O LEO TAURO AND SYLVA TAURO W/O MR. PRERAK NAVEEN D’SA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT LIESSILL, OPP. HOLY FAMILY SCHOOL, KURUPPUR ROAD, BAJPE POST, MANGALURU - 574 142 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RAKESH KINI, ADV. FOR CAV/RESPONDENT)

MFA No. 5019 of 2025 HC-KAR THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.55 OF INDIAN DIVORCE ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DT.30.01.2025 PASSED IN MC NO.511/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, D.K, MANGALURU, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/S.10(1)(ix)(x) OF THE DIVORCE ACT.

IN MFA NO. 3711/2025 BETWEEN:

MRS. PREWAL SALLY MARRIE TAURO D/O LEO TAURO AND SYLVA TAURO, W/O. PRERAK NAVEEN D’SA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT LEESILL OPP. HOLY FAMILY SCHOOL, GURUPUR ROAD, BAJPE POST, MANGALURU-574142.

...APPELLANT (BY SRI. RAKESH KINI, ADVOCATE)

AND:

MR. PRERAK NAVEENA D’SA S/O FRANCIS D’SA AND LEENA D’SILVA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT #3-44, SHALOM, BELLA, MOODUBELLA, UDUPI DISTRICT-576120.

...RESPONDENT THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.55 OF INDIAN DIVORCE ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DT. 30.01.2025 PASSED IN MC NO.511/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. JUDGE FAMILY COURT, D.K.MANGALURU, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/S.10(1)(ix)(x) OF DIVORCE ACT, 1869.

MFA No. 5019 of 2025 HC-KAR IN MFA NO. 5019/2025 BETWEEN:

MR. PRERAK NAVEEN D’SA S/O FRANCIS D’SA AND LEENA D’SILVA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT NO.3-44, SHALOM BELLE, MOODUBELLE, UDUPI DISTRICT - 576120 ...APPELLANT (BY SRI. ASHWIN JOYSTON KUTINHA, ADVOCATE)

AND:

MRS. PRAWAL SALLY MARRI TAURO D/O LEO TAURO AND SYLVIA TAURO, W/O MR. PRERAK NAVEEN D’SA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT LIESSILL, OPPOSITE HOLY FAMILY SCHOOL, KURUPPUR ROAD, BAJPE POST MANGALURU - 574142 ...RESPONDENT THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.55 OF INDIAN DIVORCE ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DT.30.01.2025 PASSED IN MC NO.511/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, D.K.MANGALURU, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/S.10(1)(ix)(x) OF THE DIVORCE ACT, 1869.

THESE APPEALS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND MFA No. 5019 of 2025 HC-KAR

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)

M.F.A. No.1597/2025 was filed seeking to set aside the judgment and decree passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Dakshina Kannada, Mangaluru in M.C.No.511/2023 on 30.01.2025 to the extent of allowing the petition filed under Section 10(1)(ix)(x) of the Divorce Act, 1869 and to allow the appeal.

2. M.F.A. No.5019/2025 was filed seeking to set aside the judgment and decree dated 30.01.2025 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Dakshina Kannada, Mangaluru in M.C.No.511/2023 dismissing the counterclaim filed by the appellant under Section 32 of the Divorce Act, 1869 and for grant of restitution of conjugal rights.

3. M.F.A. No.3711/2025 was filed seeking to set aside that part of the judgment and decree dated 30.01.2025 passed in MC No.511/2023 on the file of the Principal Judge, Family Court, Dakshina Kannada, Mangaluru granting permanent alimony of Rs.40,00,000/- and to set aside the visitation and communication rights as ordered in the impugned judgment.

MFA No. 5019 of 2025 HC-KAR

4. Pursuant to the orders passed by this Court, the parties were referred for mediation to the Karnataka Mediation Centre and a settlement that was entered into between th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top