SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 36734

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
K S HEMALEKHA
SRI A M PRASANNA KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
SRI T V NANJUNDA MURTHY – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1683 OF 2016 (INJ)

BETWEEN:

SRI A.M. PRASANNA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, R/AT NO.48 & 49 MUNESHWAR BLOCK, 3RD CROSS, AMRUTH NAGAR, AMRUTHAHALLI, SAHAKARANAGAR POST, BENGALURU-560092.

…APPELLANT (BY SRI SOMASHEKHARAIAH R.P., ADVOCATE)

AND:

SRI T.V. NANJUNDA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, S/O T.N. VENKATASWAMAPPA, Digitally signed by R/AT NO.46/2, G. BLOCK, MAHALAKSHMI B M SAHAKARANAGAR, BANGALORE-560092.

Location: HIGH …RESPONDENT COURT OF KARNATAKA (BY SRI BHANU PRASAD K., ADVOCATE FOR C/RESPONDENT)

THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.07.2016 PASSED IN O.S.NO.4955/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE XLIVTH ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PERPETUAL INJUNCTION AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION.

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDER, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA

ORAL JUDGMENT

The present appeal is preferred by the defendant assailing the judgment and decree dated 23.07.2016 in O.S. No.495

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top