SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 36738

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
SRI H K SHIVANNA – Appellant
Versus
SMT. PUTTANANJAMMA – Respondent
WP 33108/2025



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 33108 OF 2025 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

SRI H K SHIVANNA S/O LATE H. KAPANINAYAKA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS KOLLEGAL TALUK-571439 R/AT UDDANUR VILLAGE, HANUR HOBLI, KOLLEGAL TALUK - 571439 CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUNITHA P C.,ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. SMT. PUTTANANJAMMA D/O LATE H. KAPANINAYAKA, W/O KULLIMADANAYAKA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS Digitally signed R/AT UDDANUR VILLAGE, by HANUR HOBLI, KOLLEGAL TALUK-571439 GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH 2. SRI. K. MAHADEVAPPA, COURT OF S/O LATE H. KAPANINAYAKA, KARNATAKA R/AT NO. E-18, SANKAMMA NILAYA ROAD, MALAI MAHADESHWARA HILLS VILLAGE, KOLLEGAL TALUK-571490 CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT REPTD. BY SPA HOLDER MEENAKSHAMMA

3. SMT. LAKSHMIDEVAMMA W/O LATE NANJAMARINAYAKA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, 4. SRI. UMESH K.N, S/O LATE NANJAMARINAYAKA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS

5. SRI. KAPANI @ LAKSHMINAYAKA, S/O LATE NANJAMARINAYAKA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO.3 TO 5 ARE R/AT UDDANUR VILLAGE, HANUR HOBLI, KOLLEGAL TALUK-571439.

CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT

6. SMT. PREMA, D/O LATE NANJAMARINAYAKA W/O LATE NAGANAYAKA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, WORKING AS ASSISTANT COOK AT GOVT. HIGHER PRIMARY SCHOOL, MUGUR VILLAGE, T. NARASIPURA TALUK-577413, MYSORE DISTRICT

7. SMT. VANAJAKSHI, D/O LATE NANJAMARINAYAKA, W/O DRIVER NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT HOSA KURUBARA BEEDI, K.S.R.T.C. DEPO ROAD, NEAR TO KANAKA SAMUDAYABHAVANA KOLLEGAL CITY AND TALUK-571440 CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT

8. SMT. DRAKSHAYINI, D/O LATE NANJAMARINAYAKA, W/O GOVINDANAYAKA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT KANNUR VILLAGE, KOLLEGAL TALUK-571443, CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT

9. SMT. KAMALA, D/O LATE NANJAMARINAYAKA, W/O RAJU (GOPAL BAKERY), AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT MUNDIGUNDAM VILLAGE, KOLLEGAL TALUK-571440 CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT

10. SMT. PUTTAMANGALAMMA, W/O LATE K. KEMPARAJU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS

11. SMT. PUSHPA, D/O LATE K. KEMPARAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS SRI. SURESHA, S/O LATE K. KEMPARAJU, SINCE DEAD REPTD. BY HIS LRS, 12. SMT. RATHNAMMA @ RATHNA W/O LATE SURESHA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS.

13. SRI. SANJAY KUMAR @ SANJU S/O LATE SURESHA AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS

14. SRI. MADESHA @ MAHADEVASWAMY, S/O LATE K. KEMPARAJU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS

15. SMT. MALLAMMA D/O H. KAPINI NAYAKA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS RESPONDENT NO.9 TO 15 ALL ARE R/AT UDDANUR VILLAGE, HANUR HOBLI, KOLLEGAL TALUK-571439 CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT.

16. SMT. SHIVAMMA, D/O LATE H. KAPANINAYAKA, W/O RANGASWAMYNAYAKA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/AT KANNUR VILLAGE, KOLLEGAL TALUK-571443, CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT

17. SMT. MAHADEVAMMA, D/O LATE H.KAPANINAYAKA W/O SIDDARAJU, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT KURUBARADODDI VILLAGE, RAMAPURA HOBLI, KOLLEGAL TALUK-571439 CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT .

18. SRI. BASAVARADHYA, S/O LATE CHANDRA SHEKARA ARADHYA, MAJOR, 19. SMT. GAYATHRI, W/O BASAVARADHYA, MAJOR, 20. REKHA, D/O BASAVARADHYA, MAJOR, 21. SRI. SANTHOSH, S/O BASAVARADHYA, MAJOR, RESPONDENT NO. 18 TO 21 ALL ARE R/AT UDDANURU VILLAGE, HANUR HOBLI, KOLLEGAL TALUK-571439 CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT.

22. SRI. V. CHANDRA, S/O VENKATACHALA, R/AT DODDALATHURU VILLAGE, RAMAPURA HOBLI, KOLLEGAL TALUK-571444 CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT.

…RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS. DIRECT TO QUASH ORDER PASSED ON THE APPLICATION ON L.A. NO. XIV UNDER ORDER I RULE 10(2) READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC PASSED BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOLLEGAL IN O.S. NO.21/2015 DATED 10.10.2025 UNDER ANNEXURE-G BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT PETITION., AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR

ORAL ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner who is the defendant No.12 before the trial Court in OS No.21/2015.

2. This Court does not find the need or necessity to issue notice to the respondents, who are the co- defendants and plainti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top