SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 36895

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Vibhu Bakhru, CJ, C.M. Poonacha, J
Archana Bhat K – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
WP No. 27135 of 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Nitin Ramesh
For the Respondents: Niloufer Akbar

The State is mandated to effectively implement safety regulations for child pillion riders under the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, and cannot use the absence of market-available equipment as a permanent excuse for non-compliance once statutory deadlines have passed.

Headnote:(A) Motor Vehicle Safety - Implementation of Safety Rules - Rule 138(7) of the Central Motor Vehicles (Second Amendment) Rules, 2022 mandates safety harnesses, crash helmets, and speed limits (40 kmph) for children aged nine months to four years riding as pillion passengers on motorcycles. (Para 2)

(B) State Obligations - Regulatory Compliance - The State cannot indefinitely delay the implementation of central safety rules citing lack of market availability of equipment or research and development timelines of manufacturers once the statutory grace period has expired. (Para 8, 9)

Issues: Whether the respondents are mandated to strictly implement Rule 138(7) of the Central Motor Vehicles (Second Amendment) Rules, 2022 regarding child safety on motorcycles.

Legal Category Hierarchy

  • practice and procedure
    • writ jurisdiction
      • mandamus (Para 1, 10)
    • public interest litigation (Para 1, 3)
  • transport and motor vehicles
    • safety regulations
      • child pillion rider safety (Para 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11)
  • administrative law
    • implementation of statutory rules (Para 8, 9, 10)

Table of Contents

1. Writ petition seeking mandamus to implement Rule 138(7) of Central Motor Vehicles (Second Amendment) Rules, 2022 concerning child pillion rider safety. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 )

2. State contended that safety harness and crash helmets for children were not readily available, manufacturers needed time for development. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 )

3. Petition disposed of directing State to take immediate steps to implement Rule 138(7), preferably within six months. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 )

4. Is there a legal obligation on the state to implement Rule 138(7) of the Central Motor Vehicles (Second Amendment) Rules, 2022?

Yes, the rule is in force and the state is required to take effective steps to ensure its implementation. (Para 8 , 9 )

5. What direction did the court issue regarding the timeline for implementation?

The court directed the state to take immediate steps, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within six months. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 )

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W RULE 14(1) OF THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION) RULES, 2018, PRAYING TO ISSUE APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO STRICTLY IMPLEMENT RULE 138(7) OF THE CENTRAL MOTOR VEHICLES (SECOND AMENDMENT) RULES, 2022 AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE

and

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)

1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition, inter alia, praying that directions be issued to the respondents to strictly implement Rule 138(7) of the Central Motor Vehicles (Second Amendment) Rules, 2022.

2. The said rule is set out below:

"7) After one year from the date of publication of the Central Motor Vehicles (Second Amendment) Rules, 2022, the driver of a motorcycle shall ensure the following safety measures while carrying a child between the age of nine months and four years, on the vehicle as a pillion, namely: -

(i) For children below four years, Safety harness shall be used for attaching the child to the driver of the motorcycle.

Explanation.- Safety harness is a vest to be worn by the child, which shall be adjustable, with a pair of straps attached to the vest and forming shoulder loops to be worn by the driver. This way, the upper torso of the child is securely attached to the driver. A feature by which this is achieved is by attaching the straps to the back of the vest and crossing the straps over the vest so that two large crossing-over loops are formed that pass between the legs of the passenger and child sits on the seat of the two wheeler. The protective gear including Safety harness shall meet the following requirements till such time the specifications are prescribed by the Bureau of Indian Standards under the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 2016 (11 of 2016):-

Specifications of Safety harness

(a) Light weight, adjustable, waterproof and durable;

(b) Heavy nylon/ multi-filament nylon material with high density foam with sufficient cushioning;

(c) Shall be designed to hold weight upto 30 kg.

(ii) Crash helmet: The driver shall ensure that the child pillion passenger aged between nine months and four years must wear his own crash helmet which fits his head or wear bicycle helmet complying with [ASTM 1447]/[European (CEN)BS EN 1080/BS EN 1078] till such time that the specifications are prescribed by the Bureau of Indian Standards under the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 2016 (11 of 2016).

(iii) The speed of the motorcycle with the child upto age four years being carried as a pillion, shall not be more than 40 kmph."

3. In view of the above, this Court had directed the Government of Karnataka to file a response furnishing the relevant details pertaining to the subject matter and to take a stand in respect to the prayers made in the present petition.

4. The State Government has filed the statement of objections. It states that till the aforesaid rule – Rule 138(7) of the Central

Motor Vehicles (Second Amendment) Rules, 2022 – was brought into force, the public was unaware of the safety measures that were to be taken when children are riding as a pillion rider on motor cycles and other two wheelers. Therefore, the State had taken steps to launch awareness programmes to create awareness regarding children's safety and the wearing of safety harness system and crash helmets.

5. It is stated that the relevant authorities had also conducted a meeting under the Chairmanship of the Additional Commissioner for Transport (Enforcement) (South), together with the two wheeler dealers in the State and their representatives for implementing the said rule. It is stated that it was found that safety harness equipment was not readily available off the shelf in the market. Thus, it was necessary to create awareness and also to ensure that the equipment is available

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top