SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 37489

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
K.S.MUDAGAL AND VENKATESH NAIK T
THE STATE BY K R NAGAR – Appellant
Versus
MAHESHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1692/2019 (A)

BETWEEN:

THE STATE BY K.R.NAGAR POLICE STATION REPTD. BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU – 560 001 …APPELLANT (BY SMT.SOWMYA R, HCGP)

AND:

1. MAHESHA S/O KUNTASINGRAIAH AGED 25 YEARS R/O SOUTHANAHALLI VILLAGE K.R. NAGAR TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571602 Dig itally signed by K S 2. MANJUNAYAK RENUKAMBA S/O THAMMAIAYA NAYAK AGE: MAJOR Location:

OCC: AGRICULTURIST High Court of SOUTHANAHALLI VILLAGE Karnataka K.R.NAGAR TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.HEMANTH KUMAR S.R., ADVOCATE FOR R.1;

SMT.ARCHANA K M, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 378 (1)

AND (3) OF THE CR.PC. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 09.01.2019 PASSED BY THE VI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SPECIAL JUDGE, MYSURU IN S.C.NO.365/2014 ACQUITTING THE ACCUSED/RESPONDENT NO.1 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 366, 376(2)(i)

AND (n) OF IPC AND SECTION 5(l) READ WITH SECTION 6 OF POCSO ACT AND SECTION 9 OF THE PROHIBITION OF CHILD MARRIAGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top