SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 37751

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
RAJESH RAI K
SRI M CHANDRA SHETTY – Appellant
Versus
MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 621 OF 2019 (DEC)

BETWEEN:

SRI M CHANDRA SHETTY S/O MUTHA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/AT DOOR NO.C-6 P & T QUARTERS, UDAYAGIRI, MYSURU-570 007.

…APPELLANT (BY SRI. MANJESH H.M, ADVOCATE)

AND:

MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY J.L.B. ROAD, MYSURU-570 007, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

…RESPONDENT Digitally signed (BY SRI. PRAJWAL P KANCHI, ADVOCATE FOR by PANKAJA S SRI. SACHIN V.R, ADVOCATE)

Location: HIGH COURT OF THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST KARNATAKA THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.11.2018 PASSED IN RA.NO.278/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MYSURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.02.2017 PASSED IN OS.NO. 1077/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL I CIVIL JUDGE, MYSURU.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSOIN, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

ORAL JUDGMENT

The plaintiff has filed this regular second appeal.

2. The plaintiff has filed suit against the defendant for relief of declaration and mandatory injunct

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top