SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 37857

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
E.S.INDIRESH
SMT. PADMAVATHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.15693 OF 2017 (GM-CC)

BETWEEN:

1. SMT. PADMAVATHI W/O SANJEEV KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT LAKKAVALLI VILLAGE, TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT-577128.

…PETITIONER (BY SRI. K VIJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, Digitally signed by DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD, ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH BENGALURU-560001.

COURT OF KARNATAKA

2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT, CHIKKAMAGALUR-577101.

3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TARIKERE SUB DIVISION, TARIKERE TALUK, TARIKERE-577228 CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT.

4. THE TAHASILDAR TARIKERE , TARIKERE TALUK, TARIKERE-577228 CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT.

5. SMT.B.H.SUJATHA W/O L N RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC:HOUSE WIFE, R/AT LAKKAVALLI VILLAGE, LAKKAVALLI HOBLI-577128 TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R4;

SRI. K.N. DAYALU, ADVOCATE FOR R5)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN CASTE APPEAL NO.1/2016/17 PENDING BEFORE THE RESPO

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top