SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 38130

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
GEETHA K.B.
SHRI.SATISH PUNDALIC POTE – Appellant
Versus
SRI.JOTIBA S/O. RAGUNATH KALASEKAR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B.

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.103606 OF 2019 BETWEEN SHRI SATISH PUNDALIC POTE AGE : 33 YEARS, OCC : SERVICE (NOW NIL), R/O. HOUSE NO.819, SHIVAJI NAGAR KHANAPUR, DIST: BELAGAVI-

591302.

...APPELLANT (BY SMT. GEETHA K.M. ADVOCATE-THROUGH VC)

AND

1 . SRI JOTIBA, S/O. RAGUNATH KALASEKAR AGE : MAJOR, OCC : BUSINESS, A/P: DESUR, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI-590014 Digitally signed by BHARATHI H M (OWNER OF THE TRUCK KA-22/A 7759)

Location: HIGH COURT OF K D A H R A N R A W T A A D KA BENCH Date: 2025.11.15 2 . UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.

10:24:51 +0530 R/BY IT’S DIVISIONAL MANAGER, MARUTI GALLI, BELAGAVI-590001.

(INSURER OF THE TRUCK KA-22/A-7759)

…RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. PREETI SHASHANK, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

(R1-NOTICE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT 1988 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 27.04.2019 PASSED BY IN THE COURT OF IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AND MACT V BELAGAVI, IN MVC NO.858/2018 AND ENHANCE THE COMPENSATION AS CLAIMED BY THE APPELLANT BY HOLDING THAT THE INSURANCE COMPANY IS LIABLE TO PAY TH

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top