SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 38236

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
SMT SUREKHA SOUNSIKAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WP 108200/2025



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 108200 OF 2025 (GM-RES)

BETWEEN:

SMT. SUREKHA SOUNSIKAR AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: MEDICAL OFFICER, AT: CIVIL HOSPITAL DHARWAD, R/O: C/O. SHANKAR D KALASANNAVAR, SHANTI DEVA KRUPA, PLOT NO. 24 PATRESHWAR NAGAR, KOTI PLOT, NEAR NEW APMC, DHARWAD-580001.

…PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.H. PATIL, AND SRI. HARSHAWARDHANA M. PATIL, ADVOCATES)

AND:

Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA Location: Hig h Court of Karnataka, R/BY THE SECRETARY, Dharwad Bench, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND Dharwad FAMILY WELFARE, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001.

2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (MEDICAL-1), DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, AROGYA SOUDHA, 1ST CROSS, MAGADI ROAD, BENGALURU-560023.

3. THE DISTRICT SURGEON DISTRICT HOSPITAL DHARWAD DHARWAD-580008 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.T.HANUMAREDDY, AGA)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO:

A) ISSUE THE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 VIDE ORDER BEARING NO.MDA(2)/45-137/2024-25 DATED 15.03.2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-C.

B) ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO REIMBURSE AN AMOUNT OF RS.4,43,664/- ALONG WITH THE INTEREST TILL THE DATE OF REALIZATION IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)

The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following prayer.

A) Issue the Writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order passed by the respondent No.2 vide order bearing No.MDA(2)/45-137/2024-25 dated

15.03.2025 vide ANNEXURE-C B) Issue writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to reimburse an amount of Rs.4,43,664/- along with the interest till the date of realization in the interest of justice and equity.

C) Issue any other Writ or order which deems fit to this Hon’ble Court in the interest of justice and equity.

2. Heard the learned counsel Sri. Harshawardhana M.

Patil, appearing for the petitioner and the learned AGA for respondents.

3. The facts in brief germane are as follows.

4. The issue lies in a narrow compass. The petitioner gets herself treated in a particular hospital – KLES Hospital and Medical Research Center, Belagavi. The petitioner being a government servant submits an application to the State seeking reimbursement of medical expenses. The said claim of the petitioner seeking medical reimbursement comes to be rejected by the following order:

EªÀjUÉ DqÀ½vÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ f¯Áè D¸ÀàvÉæ –

zsÁgÀªÁqÀ 580 008.

ªÀiÁ£ÀågÉÃ.

«µÀAiÀÄ: ²æÃªÀÄw ¸ÀÄgÉÃSÁ ¸ÀA²PÀgÀ ±ÀıÀƵÁ¢üSÁj EªÀgÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ aQvÁì ªÉZÀÑzÀ ©°èUÉ CºÀðvÀ ªÉÆvÀÛ ªÀÄgÀÄ¥ÁªÀw¸ÀĪÀ §UÉÎ, G¯ÉèÃR: F PÀbÉÃjAiÀÄ ¸ÀªÀÄ ¸ÀASÉå:JArJ(02)/137/2023-24 ¢£ÁAPÀ:23.02.2024 ***

ªÉÄîÌAqÀ «µÀAiÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ G¯ÉèÃRPÉÌ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ ²æÃªÀÄw ¸ÀÄgÉÃSÁ ¸ÀA²PÀgÀ ±ÀıÀƵÁ¢üSÁj EªÀgÀ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ aQvÁì ªÉZÀÑ ªÀÄgÀÄ¥ÁªÀw PÀÄjvÀÄ G¯ÉèÃTvÀ gÀ ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è ¸ÀzÀjAiÀĪÀgÀÄ KLES DR PRABHAKAR KORE HOSPITAL AND MRC BELAGAVI. E°è aQvÉì ¥ÀqÉ¢gÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ F D¸ÀàvÉæAiÀÄÄ ¸ÀPÁðgÀ¢AzÀ ªÀiÁ£ÀåvÉ ¥ÀqÉ¢gÀÄ«®èzÀ DzÀ PÁgÀt PÁAiÀÄðPÁj ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ ¸ÀĪÀtð DgÉÆÃUÀå ¸ÀÄgÀPÁë læ¸ïÖ EªÀjUÉ ªÀÄÆ® ©®ÄèUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÀ¼ÀÄ»¸À¯ÁVvÀÄÛ ¸ÀĪÀtð DgÉÆÃUÀå ¸ÀÄgÀPÁë læ¸ïÖ EªÀgÀÄ ©®ÄèUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¹zÁUÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà vÀÄvÀÄð ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðUÀ¼ÀÄ PÀAqÀħgÀzÀ PÁgÀt ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ ªÉZÀÑzÀ ©®ÄèUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀÄgÀÄ¥ÁªÀwUÉ ªÀiÁ£Àå ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä CªÀPÁ±À«gÀĪÀÅ¢®è JA§ÄzÁV w½¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ. (¥Àæw ®UÀwÛ¹zÉ) JA§ ªÀiÁ»wAiÉÆA¢UÉ ¸À°è¹gÀĪÀ J¯Áè ªÀÄÆ® ©®ÄèUÀ¼À£ÀÄß F ¥ÀvÀæzÉÆA¢UÉ CqÀPÀ«j¹ »A¢gÀÄV¸À¯ÁVzÉ.

vÀªÀÄä «±Áé¹ ¸À»/-

G¥À ¤zÉÃð±ÀPÀgÀÄ (ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ-1)

DgÉÆÃUÀå ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀÄlÄA§ PÀ¯Áåt ¸ÉêÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the hospital is the same. The nomenclature is changed. Earlier it was KLES Hospital and Medical Research Centre and now the name is changed to KLES Prabhakar Kore Hospital and Medical Research Cen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top