THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
SRI.UMAKANTH. N.N. S/O LATE NAGENDRAPPA – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER – Respondent
WP 104208/2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO.104208 OF 2024 (SCST)
BETWEEN:
SRI. UMAKANTH N.N. S/O LATE NAGENDRAPPA, AGE. 52 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O. NEAR PADAGATTE, ANAJI GOLLARAHALLI VILLAGE, TQ. AND DIST. DAVANAGERE-577 001.
… PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANIL KALE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HOSPET, DIST. VIJAYANAGAR-583 201. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, HARAPANAHALLI SUB DIVISION, HARAPANAHALLI-583 131, DIST. VIJAYANAGAR.
CHANDRASHEKAR L K A A X T M TI A M N ANI DCKLKD+ oA a Hi a0 g crt T 5 Ai ena t 3 TN : ta a 0 Ii 2t l oMD a0 y n R k A 2 : s a AN 5 H i , gS . I D1 i nH g 1h e h E . d a2 K Cr 9 b w A o y 1 u R a1 rd t L : 1 B A o 9ef X :n4 M c2h AN 3. H TH A E R A T P A A H N A A S H IL A D L A LI R , , TQ. HARAPANAHALLI-583 131, DIST. VIJAYANAGAR.
SRI. P.T. CHOWDAPPA S/O LATE POOJARI THIMMAPPA, SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR’S., 4. SMT. CHANDRAMMA W/O LATE P.T. CHOWDAPPA, AGE. 55 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, ANAJI GOLLARAHALLI VILLAGE, ANAGODU HOBLI, TQ. AND DIST. DAVANAGERE-577 001.
5. HEMAVATHI D/O LATE P.T. CHOWDAPPA, AGE. 35 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, ANAJI GOLLARAHALLI VILLAGE, ANAGODU HOBLI, TQ. AND DIST. DAVANAGERE-577 001.
6. SRI. DHANARAJ C.
S/O LATE P.T. CHOWDAPPA, AGE. 32 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, ANAJI GOLLARAHALLI VILLAGE, ANAGODU HOBLI, TQ. AND DIST. DAVANAGERE-577 001.
7. SRI. KUMARA C.P.
S/O LATE P.T. CHOWDAPPA, AGE. 30 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, ANAJI GOLLARAHALLI VILLAGE, ANAGODU HOBLI, TQ. AND DIST. DAVANAGERE-577 001.
8. SRI. KUBERA G.C.
S/O LATE P.T. CHOWDAPPA, AGE. 27 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, ANAJI GOLLARAHALLI VILLAGE, ANAGODU HOBLI, TQ. AND DIST. DAVANAGERE-577 001.
… RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAVEEN K. UPPAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R3;
NOTICE TO R4 TO R8 IS SERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 03.07.2024 IN NO.APPEAL/PTCL/01/2023-24 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.1 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-K AND ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 06.02.2024 IN NO.PTCL (H.HALLI)/CR/05-2022 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-H.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE)
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents No.1 to 3. Respondents No.4 to 8 - the contesting private parties though served, are not represented.
2. This petition is filed assailing the order dated
03.07.2024 passed by respondent No.1-Deputy Commissioner, who confirmed order dated 06.02.2024 passed by respondent No.2-Assistant Commissioner.
3. In terms of order dated 06.02.2024, respondent No.2-Assistant Commissioner on an application filed by respondents No.4 to 8 resumed the land and directed re-grant in favour of respondents No.4 to 8, who are the children of the seller, who sold the land under two registered sale deeds dated
17.02.2004 and 04.05.2006. The property sold is Sy.No.488/1 in Chatinahalli village, Arasikere Hobli, Harappanahalli Taluk.
4. Respondent No.1-Deputy Commissioner had dismissed appeal confirming order passed by respondent No.2-Assistant Commissioner.
5. Both authorities have held that the sale transaction dated 17.02.2004 in respect of 2 Acre and sale transaction dated 04.05.2006 in respect of 2 Acre in respect of the aforementioned survey number in favour of the petitioner are hit by the provisions of the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 (for short ‘Act of 1978’).
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the claim is hit by delay and latches and squarely covered in terms of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Nekkanti Rama Lakshmi v. State of Karnataka and another, (2020) 14 SCC 232
7. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents-Sta
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.