ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)

1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following prayer:

II. Issue any other appropriate order/s as this Hon’ble Court deems fit in view of the above narrated facts and grounds to meet the end of justice.”

2. Heard Shri Chetan T.Limibikai, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Smt. Girija S.Hiremath, learned HCGP appearing for respondent No.1 and Shri Y.Lakshmikant Reddy, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2.

3. The petitioner is appointed as a daily wage employee on 27.04.1995 describing him to be a literate assistant. Subsequently was appointed as a typist in the vacant sanctioned post with effect from 01.02.1996. In the light of the judgment rendered by the Apex Court in the case of SECRETARY, STATE OF KARNATAKA VS. UMADEVI (3), (2006) 4 SCC 1. the regularisation of several employees take place. The averment in the petition is that several of the employees were regularised by the State, who were similarly placed. The petitioner though continued to work as a typist right from 1996 did not find favour with the State for regularisation of his services, had to knock at the doors of this Court in Writ Pe