SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 38490

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.I.Arun, J
R. D. Chaitra – Appellant
Versus
Directorate Of Enforcement – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO.26754 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Siddhartha Dave, H.S. Chandramouli, Kiran S. Javali, Prateek Chandramouli
For the Respondents: Aravind Kamat, Madhukar Deshpande, Zoheb Hussain

The existence of a scheduled (predicate) offence is a foundational requirement for initiation of proceedings under the money-laundering legislation. Once a predicate offence is established, investigative authorities can form a 'reason to believe' for an individual's arrest if material suggests involvement in money laundering and proceeds of crime.

Headnote:(A) Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 - Sections 3, 19 and 2(1)(u) - Constitution of India - Articles 21, 226 and 227 - Arrest under Act - Foundation of proceedings - Requirement of predicate offence.

(B) Money Laundering - Existence of scheduled offence is foundational for registration of case - Powers derived from predicate offence - 'Reason to believe' for arrest must be an independent opinion based on material in possession - Not an arbitrary opinion. (Paras 14, 15)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged the arrest of her husband for alleged money laundering. The respondent argued that despite the closure of some initial criminal cases, the investigation uncovered substantial evidence of a vast illegal betting racket, which constitutes a scheduled offence and proceeds of crime, justifying the custodial interrogation.

Findings of Court:
The court observed that while multiple prior criminal proceedings were dismissed or closed, one pending criminal complaint involving cheating and impersonation served as a sufficient predicate offence. The investigative agency demonstrated sufficient material to form a 'reason to believe' that the accused was involved in money laundering activities, justifying the arrest under the statutory provisions.

Issues: Whether a scheduled offence existed to initiate proceedings and whether the investigative agency had sufficient material to form a 'reason to believe' for the arrest.

Ratio Decidendi: The foundational requirement for initiation of proceedings under the Act is the existence of a scheduled offence. Once such an offence is identified and material is produced demonstrating potential involvement in laundering proceeds of crime beyond the scope of a single complaint, the formation of a belief for arrest under the Act is legally tenable.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. basis for detention and investigative history of ecir registration. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. contention regarding existence and validity of predicate scheduled offenses. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 20 , 21)
3. requirements for 'reason to believe' and foundational necessity of predicate offenses. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
4. application of evidentiary material to justify custodial arrest under pmla. (Para 19 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
5. dismissal of writ petition with liberty for future legal recourse. (Para 27 , 28)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 528 OF THE B.N.S.S., PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ARREST OF THE ACCUSED NO.1 PURSUANT TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE GROUNDS OF ARREST (ANNEXURE-G) MADE ON 23.08.2025 ARISING OUT OF ECIR/BGZO/19/2025 REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT HEREIN FROM GANGTOK, SIKKIM AS BEING WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ILLEGAL, ARBITRARY, VIOLATIVE OF THE ACCUSED NO.1's FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS GUARANTEED UNDER ARTICLES 19 AND 21 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, ETC.

THIS WRIT PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR ORDERS ON 13.10.2025 AND COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT PRONOUNCED THE FOLLOWING:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN

CAV ORDER

1. The husband of the petitioner has been arrested pursuant to registration of Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) under the provisions of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the PMLA, 2002’).

2. The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:

"a) Call for the entire records pertaining to ECIR/BGZO/19/2025 registered by the Respondent herein before this Hon'ble Court; and

b) Declare that the arrest of the Accused No.1 pursuant to the issuance of the Grounds of Arrest (Annexure-G) made on 23.08.2025 arising out of ECIR/BGZO/19/2025 registered by the Respondent herein from Gangtok, Sikkim as being without jurisdiction, illegal, arbitrary, violative of the Accused No.1's fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

c) Consequently, direct the release of the Accused No.1, arrested pursuant to the issuance of the Grounds of Arrest (Annexure-G) made on 23.08.2025 arising out of ECIR/BGZO/19/2025 carried out by the Respondent in connection with E.C.I.R/BGZO/19/2025 registered by the Respondent herein in the interest of justice."

3. The grounds of arrest to arrest Mr. K.C. Veerendra (husband of the petitioner) under Section 19 of the PMLA, 2002 reads as under:

"Ground of Arrest to arrest Mr. K C Veerendra under section 19 of PMLA, 2002 (ECIR/BGZO/19/2025)

1. You, Mr. K C Veerendra, the main accused in FIR No. 0064/2011 dated 24.10.2022 registered at Challekere Police Station under Sections 420 of IPC 1860, 66 of Information Technology Act, 2000, 79 and 80 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963 , and FIR No. 215/2022 dated 24.10.2022 registered at Davenagere Extension Police Station under sections 34, 420, 506 of IPC 1860, 78 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963 .

2. That in the aforesaid FIRs, the gist of the allegations are as follows:

2.1. FIR No. 0064/2011 dated 02.03.2011 registered at Challakere Police Station, Chitradurga District, Acts invoked: Information Technology Act 2000 u/s [66], IPC 1860 u/s [420], Karnataka Police Act, 1963 u/s [79], [80]

Accused:

• Ramesha

• Vikki @ Mobile Shop Vikki

• KC Veerendra @ Pappi S/o Late k Channabasappa

• KB Nagaraja S/o Kenganna

FIR Contents: As per the FIR No. 0064/2011 dated 02.03.2011 registered at Challakere Police Station, Chitradurga District, on 02.03.2011 at 05.15 pm, at the residence of one of the accused K.C. Veerendra in Veerabhadraswamy Layout, Challakere Town, Veerendra along with the other accused Nagaraja was watching the live broadcast of the World Cup Cricket match between England and Ireland on TV and were talking to bettors and customers through mobile phones. The accused persons were alleged to have been deceiving people by bet

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top